Classification and Phylogeny
- Biological classification
- Romans developed categories for animals living on land, in water or in air
- Carolus Linnaeus (1707-1778) wrote Systema Naturae (1758) and created the Linnaean system, a hierarchical naming system which is still in use today
- Binomial nomenclature - all species are identified with a Genus and species name
- Each species is grouped with other species in higher categories:
- Kingdom (King) Animalia Plantae
- Phylum (Philip) Chordata Tracheophyta
- Class (Came) Mammalia Angiospermae
- Order (of) Primates Rosales
- Family (fairly) Hominidae Rosaceae
- Genus species (good size) Homo sapiens Rosa elegans
- Although still in use, does not always indicate evolutionary relationships. Widespread agreement that classification system should reflect evolution. This has spurned an active research effort to develop a phylogenetic classification system.
- Concept of phylogeny
- What is a phylogenetic tree?
- Indicates evolutionary relationships
- Often attempt to be strictly dichotomous
- Can indicate branching patterns and/or branch lengths, e.g. evolutionary time
- A rooted tree indicates the order in which events occurred. Roots can be established
- outgroup - taxa that are unrelated, but share enough features to indicate what ancestor looked like
- fossil
- Phylogeny is specified by the branching pattern, not the order of the tips
- What characters are used to build trees?
- Independent - two characters should be able to evolve separately
- Homologous - traits are evolutionarily related, e.g. forelimb, not wings, should be derived homologies. Ancestral homologies do not provide information.
- Minimize homoplasy, where homoplasy means traits look the same, but are not homologous. Caused by
- convergence
- parallelism (convergence in recently diverged species)
- reversals - can occur easily in DNA
- available in large numbers
- Phylogenetic systematics
- Cladistics (Willi Hennig - 1950)
- Identify monophyletic groups on the basis of shared derived traits, e.g. mammals have fur and milk which were inherited from a common ancestor, termed synapomorphies. Determine if traits are derived using
- outgroups - did they possess the trait?
- fossils
- Synapomorphies identify evolutionary branch points
- Synapomorphies are nested
- If there are no homoplasies (reversals), then tree-building is easy
- If homoplasies are present, then use parsimony- fewest number of character changes
- Minimizes homoplasy
- Characters must be discrete
- Example using sequence data
- Phenetics
- Minimize distance defined in character space
- cannot detect homoplasies
- different distance metrics can produce different trees
- example using distances on x-y plot
- tends to work reasonably well with lots of characters and constant rates of change
- Using phylogenies
- Scaling branch lengths for time
- Align nodes with fossil dates
- Homind evolution - predict Homo-Pan split at 15 MYA
- Molecular clock
- Zuckerkandl and Linus Pauling (1962) - amino acid seqs of hemoglobin and cyt C
- 1977 - Vince Sarich and Allan Wilson - predicted Homo-Pan split at 5 MYA using albumin aa sequence
- a clock is justified if
- change is neutral
- mutation is equally likely throughout the sequence
- substitutions then occur due to drift
- many genes show evidence of clock-like behavior
- But, each gene often has a different clock, as do some lineages
- clocks need to be calibrated against the fossil record
- Reconciling phylogeny and taxonomy (evolutionary taxonomy)
- Current taxonomy is based on phenetics
- does not always produce monophyletic groups, for example
- reptiles: lizards, snakes, turtles & crocodiles: share
- internal fertilization
- scaly skin
- 4 chambered heart
- membrane bound (amniotic) egg
- birds - differ by having feathers, not scaly skin
- cladistic approach shows that birds evolved from dinosaurs, reptiles are not monophyletic
- Current taxonomy is being overhauled
- GENBANK is using phylogenetic scheme
- Now 8 kingdoms, whereas there were 5 last year!