Exam II Rescheduled
- Lecture Exam II will be given on Thursday, April 27, instead
of Thursday, April 20.
- Format (types and approximate number of questions) will be the
same as in Lecture Exam I.
- I will be available for questions or discussion in the sunny
part of the Student Union (outside McDonalds) from
11:00-1:00 on Thursday, April 20.
Uniramia -
The Conquest of Land and Air
- A Quick Review:
- Arthropod Bauplan
- Arthropod relationships
- Mandibles
- Anterior segments
Outline:
- Challenges and general solutions to life on land
- Gravity
- Locomotion
- Respiration
- Water balance
- Sensory systems
- Reproduction
- Uniramian synapomorphies
- Diversity in the subphylum Uniramia
- Myriapoda (Class Chilopoda, Class Diplopoda)
- Class Insecta
- Synapomorphies of the Insecta
- Fossil history
- Relationships and evolutionary innovations
- "Apterygota" -- paraphyletic wingless insect groups
- Pterygota -- monophyletic winged insect groups
- 2 types of Pterygota (Paleoptera, Neoptera)
- 3 theories for the origin of wings
- How do wings work?
- Factors involved in insect success
- Small body size
- Short generation time
- Complex behavior
- Mouthparts
- Powered flight
- Complex life cycles with complete metamorphosis
A Quick Review:
The Arthropod Bauplan
- General characteristics
- Segmentation/Metamerism/Tagmosis
- Open circulatory system
- Well developed
- Appendages
- Respiratory systems (trachea or gills)
- Sensory organs
- Metamorphosis common
Arthropod relationships
A closer look at mandibles
- Shared by Crustacea and Uniramia
- From third segment
- Differ in details
- Crustacea - "Gnathobasic"
- Uniramia - "Whole arm"
- Jaw a single element
- Chew with end rather than base
Anterior segments (head = 1-5)
See handout
Uniramia
The conquest of land and air
Uniramia - "crustaceans of the land" (we
sometimes call crustaceans "insects of the sea")
- And then some ...
- In virtually all terrestrial habitats
- Underground
- Surfaces
- Boring
- Flying
- Secondarily aquatic
- Etc., etc.
Challenges and general solutions to life on land -
Gravity
- Challenges
- Body not supported by medium
- Energetic cost of supporting body in a relatively light
medium
- Large body is size difficult to attain
- Develop area vs. mass
- General solutions
- Strong, light exoskeleton
- Tubular design resists buckling
- Exoskeleton a composite (epicuticle - thin, flexible;
exocuticle - scleratized; endocuticle - laminated)
- Layering makes it both strong and flexible
- Tagmosis and reduction of segments
- Extra stiffening (to withstand muscle pull)
- Problems of exoskeleton
- Requires molting in order to grow
- Animal left vulnerable to predators, gravity, etc.
- Physiologically costly, significant mortality
- Limits maximum size
- Exokeleton gets too heavy and molting gets too costly
Challenges and general solutions to life on land -
Locomotion
- Challenges
- Need for high speed
- Need for flexible pattern of limb movement
- Need for better balance
- Need for support
- General solutions
- Reduction in limb number
- Reduces problem of foot placement
- Reduces recovery time
- Allows longer strides
- Not found in all terrestrial arthropods, as we'll see
- Larger brain
- More complex control of locomotion
Challenges and general solutions to life on land -
Respiration
- Challenges
- Air high in O2 and it's easy to move in
air (little resistance), but ...
- Gills and similar structures tend to collapse due to surface
tension
- Water loss at respiratory surfaces
- General solutions
- Oxygen exchange occurs in semi-enclosed chambers:
- Book lungs in arachnids
- Air enter spiracles (small opening reduces water loss)
- Gases exchanged across elaborate, layered book lung
- Tracheae
- Air enters spiracles
- Tracheae ramify throughout body
- Diffusion or sometimes ventilation (pumping)
- Convergent structures in Uniramia, some Arachnida, some
Crustacea (isopods)
Challenges and general solutions to life on land -
Water balance
- Challenges
- Evaporative water loss is a big problem in air, especially at
high temperatures (air also has greater temperature variation than
water)
- Water potentially lost via:
- Surface
- Respiratory organs
- Defecation
- Excretion
- General solutions
- Stay in humid environments (behavioral regulation)
- Waxy epicuticle (insects)
- Improved excretory systems
- Malpighian tubules: secrete uric acid (water removed as
uric acid molecule formed; uric acid associated with least
amount of H2O lost of any nitrogenous wastes--NH3, urea, uric
acid)
Challenges and general solutions to life on land -
Sensory systems
- Challenges
- Sensory medium very different
- Light/odors more easily transmitted in air than water
- Sound less easily transmitted in air than in water
- General solutions
- Increased emphasis on vision on land
Challenges and general solutions to life on land -
Reproduction
- Challenges
- No planktonic environment on land
- Outcrossing
- Harder to disperse gametes
- Harder to disperse young
- Potentially harder to find mates
- General solutions
- Loss of planktonic larvae
- Direct sperm transfer
- Arachnids - pedipalps used to transfer sperm
- Uniramia - various structures facilitate sperm transfer
- Requires copulation, often sophistocated courtship and
mating behaviors -- sets up possibility of sexual selection
(many crustaceans also have copulation and complex social
behaviors, but some marine invertebrates broadcast eggs and
sperm into the sea water without mating)
- General solutions
- Loss of planktonic Larvae
- Direct sperm transfer
- Arachnids - pedipalps
- Uniramia - various structures
- Requires copulation, enhances possibility of
sexual selection
- Flight - facilitates finding mates, complicated courtships,
enhances possibility of sexual selection
Diversity of the Phylum Uniramia
- Millions of species (some experts say 30 million, concensus
closer to 10 million known plus unkown species, about 1 million
described species)
- Two major groups
- Myriapoda
- Insecta
- Appendages uniramous
- The vast majority of uniramians are insects
Uniramian Synapomorphies
- Whole limb jaws
- Tracheal gas exchange
- Convergent* with those in arachnids and isopods
- Malpighian tubules
- Convergent* with those in arachnids
- Loss of second appendage
- Antennae in crustaceans
- Legs or pedipalps in trilobites and chelicerates
- *independently evolved in terrestrial
forms
Anterior segments (head = 1-5)
(see handout)
Myriapoda (Chilopoda, Diplopoda)
- Characteristics
- Two tagmata - Head, trunk
- Appendages on most trunk segments
- No waxy cuticle
- Synapomorphies
- Repugnatorial glands
- Have ocelli, lost compound eyes (or never had them?)
Class Chilopoda
- Centipedes - 2,500 species
- First maxilliped modified as venomous fang
- Active predators
- Can be fast!
- Retain large number of body segments
Class Diplopoda
- Millipedes - 10,000 species
- Two pairs of legs on each segment (probably results from fused
segments)
- Very large number of legs
- Record - 752!
- Numerous, ventrally placed legs good for burrowing
- Gnathochilarium
- Retain large number of body segments
Class Insecta
- Incredibly diverse
- At least 10,000,000 known and unknown species! -- more than
any other group of animals on Earth
- Primitively, numerous segments with legs
- But more advanced, specialized groups have reduced segments
and legs
- Synapomorphies
- Three tagmata
- Head (5 segments)
- Thorax (3 segments)
- Abdomen (11 segments)
- Loss of abdomenal appendages
- Waxy cuticle
- Fossil history
- Appear about 400 mya
- Late Paleozoic radiation
- Two important points:
- Many groups have become extinct or reduced in prominence
- Large proportion of modern insect families are found in a
relatively few, extraordinarily successful orders
- Coleoptera (beetles)
- Diptera (flies)
- Leptidoptera (moths and butterflies)
- Hymenoptera (ants, wasps, bees)
Class Insecta - Success
- Why have insects been so successful on land?
- More specifically,
- Why were insects so successful in initially invading land?
- Why have some insect groups been so successful compared to
other insects (and animals in general)?
- In addition to their small body size, we'll focus on two key
innovations that allowed them to successfully invade and radiate
on land:
- 1) The origin and evolution of wings
- 2) New patterns of development
- First, we'll look at the relationships of the major groups of
insects in order to understand their evolutionary innovations
Class Insecta - Relationships
- Cladogram: 2 sister groups:
- "Apterygota"
- Primitively wingless
- Direct development
- Pterygota
- Within the winged insects, 2 sister groups:
- Paleoptera (primitive wing form)
- Neoptera (advanced wing form)
- Within the Neoptera, 2 sister groups:
*Hemimetabolous development
*Holometabolous development
Class Insecta - "Apterygota"
- Paraphyletic
- Collembola - springtails
- Thysanura - silverfish
- No wings
- Primitively absent
- Direct development
- Young appear like small adults (no larva or pupa, no
metamorphosis)
Class Insecta - Pterygota
- Monophyletic
- Single origin of wings
- The vast majority of insects are pterygotes
- 2 types of pterygotes
- Paleoptera
- Neoptera
- 2 types of development
- Hemimetabolous
- Holometabolous
Two types of Pterygotes
- Paleoptera
- Wings do not fold, are held out or upward
- E.g., dragonflies, mayflies
- Neoptera
- Wings fold flat over back
- Includes most insects
- E.g., houseflies, beetles, grasshoppers
- In Siphonaptera (lice, fleas -- related to flies) - wings are
secondarily lost
Two types of development
- Hemimetabolous development
- Primitive
- But retained in many modern pterygote orders
- Fertilized egg develops into a larva that undergoes partial
metamorphosis, but larva hatches as a juvenile, and passes
through a number of molts to gradually assume adult form
- Holometabolous development
- Derived - occurs in the 5 terminal, specialized lineages
characterized by extraordinary success
- Fertilized egg develops into a larva that has a completely
different morphology and ecology from the adult (larva specialized
for feeding and growth)
- Larva develops into a pupa (chrysalis) - quiescent stage in
which body is completely reorganized = complete metamorphosis
Class Insecta - Pterygota
- 1) Hemimetabolous development
- 2) Holometabolous development
- In derived, specialized, successful
lineages
- Larva specialized for feeding and growth
- Pupa undergoes complete metamorphosis
- Adult emerges in a completely new, final form and never molts
again; ecology is completely different from larva. Adult often
specialized for reproduction: for mobility and dispersal, for
finding mates and places to reproduce, may even be unable to feed.
Evolution of wings
- How did wings evolve?
- What good is half a wing (i.e., how did wings start to evolve,
how could a tiny flap be an advantage)?
- Three general theories of the origin of wings
- 1) Paranotal origin
- 2) Branchial origin
- 3) Heat collector origin
- All attempt to present uses for incipient structures
Evolution of wings - Paranotal origin
- Wings originally developed from lateral extensions of thorax
to stabilize landing from a jump
- Lateral extensions may have become longer to allow gliding
during a jump from one plant to another, then powered flying was
eventually developed
- Pro:
- Lateral extensions from various thoracic segments (e.g.,
paranotal lobe) are seen in some fossil insects
- Con:
- Would need to evolve:
- Hinge mechanism
- Muscles for control
Evolution of wings - Branchial origin
- Wings arose from thoracic gills that evolved for swimming,
aeration
- Paddle-like structures of emergent insects may facilitate
gliding (or stabilizing jumps) from plant to plant, then powered
flying eventually developed
- Pros:
- Various fossil and contemporary aquatic insects are known to
have flap-like gills for swimming or aeration
- Muscles and articulations are present
- Cons:
- Tough to imagine flight evolving in water (although some
nymphs were terrestrial or semi-terrestrial, as in modern
dragonflies)
- Many known gills arise from abdomen rather than thorax
Evolution of wings - Heat collectors
- Extensions of the body originally evolved to collect heat from
the environment
- Lateral extensions may have become longer to allow gliding
during a jump from one plant to another, then flying was
eventually developed
- Pros:
- Even incipient wings would have collected heat when surface
was exposed to sun
- Lateral extensions of the thorax are known in fossil insects
- Cons:
- Would need to evolve:
- Hinge mechanism
- Muscles for control
How are wings moved?
- Muscles work antagonistically (flexor, extensor)
- Direct vs. indirect operation of wings
- Direct: contraction of muscles pulls wing up directly or down
(power stroke) directly
- Indirect: Muscle pulls a secondary structure (e.g., dorsal
surface of thorax) that moves the wing relative to a fulcrum (side
of thorax)
- Upstroke always indirect (contracting muscle pulls dorsal
thorax down relative to fulcrum, flipping wing up)
- Downstroke either direct or indirect:
- Direct - e.g., dragonflies (Odonata)
- Angular contracting muscle is inserted outside the fulcrum,
pulls wings down directly
- Direct control of wings is primitive within the Pterygota
How are wings moved?
- Upstroke always indirect
- Downstroke either direct or indirect:
- Direct - e.g., Odonata (dragonflies)
- Contracting muscle inserted outside the
fulcrum
- Primitive in Pterygota
- Indirect - e.g., Diptera (flies)
- Longitudinal (anterior-posterior) muscles contract , bending
dorsal thorax up (above fulcrum), pulling wings down
(upstroke indirect as above - dorso-ventral muscles contract to
pull dorsal thorax down below fulcrum, flipping wings up)
- Thorax is used as an elastic vibrator, assisting power stroke
(down)
- Hinge/fulcrum area allows greater flexibility of wing (figure
8 movement of wings allows hovering and greater maneuverability)
- Myogenic control in fast insects
- Muscles contract due to intrinsic rhythm rather than
depending on external nervous impulse for each contraction
- Indirect control is derived in specialized pterygotes
Factors in insect success
- Small body size
- Microhabitats (more different kinds of small
habitats)
- Reduced support problems
- Usually relatively low dispersal associated with small body
size (unless carried by wind or migratory) -- leads to isolation,
divergence, speciation
Factors in insect success
- Small body size
- Short generation time
- Rapid colonizaton of new habitats (if dispersal is not too
great, occasional new colonists can establish themselves and
diverging genotypes wont be swamped out by new dispersing
individuals of the old genotype)_
- Can exploit temporary habitats
- Quickly adapt, potential for rapid genetic change because of
short generation time
Factors in insect success
- Small body size
- Short generation time
- Complex behavior
- Learning
- Complicated courtship and mating rituals allow the development
of sexual selection
- Sociality - aggregate in groups
- Eusociality - cooperative, altruistic behavior (where
individual may pass on more genes by helping another, e.g., a
relative with shared genes, than by reproducing him/herself)
Factors in insect success
- Small body size
- Short generation time
- Complex behavior
- Adaptable mouthparts
- From chewing to sucking, biting, piercing, sponging, etc.
- Exploit wide variety of food, including parasitism
Factors in insect success
- Small body size
- Short generation time
- Complex behavior
- Adaptable mouthparts
- Powered flight
- Can find patchy, protected foods
- Can find and compete for mates
- Allows aggregation of individuals, migrations
Factors in insect success
- Small body size
- Short generation time
- Complex behavior
- Adaptable mouthparts
- Powered flight
- Complex life cycle: complete metamorphosis
- Gradation of life history patterns: Direct -> Hemimetaboly
-> Holometaboly
- Larvae focus on acquiring resources, adults focus on
reproduction
- Larvae, adults don't compete for food
- Larvae, adults often live in separate habitats, not exposed to
same predators - difficult for predator to eliminate them
Factors in insect success
- Holometabolic groups - The majority of modern insects! The
most spectacular recent evolutionary radiations!
- Coleoptera
- Hymenoptera
- Diptera
- Lepidoptera