Palagi, E., and Dapporto, L. 2006. Urine marking and urination in Lemur catta: a comparison of
design features. Ann. Zool. Fennici 43:
280-284
In this article, the
Òdesign featuresÓ of signal by Lemur
catta using urine deposition was investigated. According to the article, Lemur catta deposits urine with two tail
configurations: the first one is urine marking, urine deposition is combined
with an evident display of the tail, which is held up; the second one is
urinating, where the tail is only slightly raised.
Urine marking is a
complex signal with multimodal and multiple characteristics, which directs to
both group members and to neighboring groups. Lemur catta are predicted to use a combination of visual and
chemical cues since they live in tropical areas where the high temperature and
humidity strongly decrease the durability of scent deposition, the visual cues
could help receivers in a quicker detection of the scent.
Data was collected on
two groups of 10 healthy individuals of Lemur
catta housed in the zoo. The two groups shared the same territory in
alternation for the same amount of time each day and were always allowed with
olfactory and visual contact through the doors separating them. The urine marking
behavior was discriminated from urinating by the presence of the tail display.
The results show what
signal features differ between urine marking and urination. Also, it has been
determined that the location of the signaler is the most important factor in
distinguishing the two configurations. For instance, the urine scent could be
lost or dispersed by wind when released from elevated sites such as trees.
Therefore, it is more effective for lemurs to deposit urine on the ground to
permit the receivers to associate the tail display with scent location.
The topic presented
here relates to what we learned in lecture. The article talks significantly about
design of threat signals of lemurs. The urine scent lemurs used in range threat
signals combines visual and olfactory mechanisms. The
signals are not transmitted very far because sender and receiver are close, and
they used posture movement to enhance the receiverÕs response. However, it does
not involve any predators in this experiment, thus suggesting that the signal
conspicuousness is largely decreased. But further research on wild lemurs may
be a good approach to better understand the findings of this study.